Main | February 2007 »

January 28, 2007

Praise the Lord, Punch in Your PIN

The Orlando Sentinel had a story yesterday about Stevens Creek Community Church in Augusta, Georgia, where “God takes credit cards.  Debit cards, too.”

Two “giving kiosks” sit just outside the church’s chapel, next-generation collection plates that allow churchgoers to swipe their credit or debit cards and instantly send donations to the church.  . . .  Pastor Marty Baker has renamed the black terminals “automatic tithe machines.”  “We’re just trying to connect with the culture,” Baker says. “And that’s how the culture does business. It’s more than an ATM for Jesus. It’s about erasing barriers.”

The giving kiosks do seem to have erased some barriers to giving.  Since their installation in early 2005, Stevens Creek has experienced an 18% increase in donations.  And they are, in some sense, helping the church “connect with the culture.”  One woman “says she knew the church was the right fit for her the first time she saw the kiosks. ‘This church gets how I live,’ she says.” 

As a Christian committed to helping others understand the joy of giving, I’m intrigued by Pastor Baker’s success in leading his flock to a higher plane of generosity.  As a Christian trying to help the Church and the wider society understand each other, I’m encouraged that Stevens Creek is looking for ways to connect with the culture.  Yet, I wonder whether there is reason for the Christian mind to be concerned with Pastor Baker’s giving kiosks.

For the Christian, giving is nothing less than an act of worship, an act of surrender to our King, and an acknowledgment of His sovereignty over all.

The act of giving is a vivid reminder that our life is all about God, not about us.  It says, “I am not the point, God is the point.  He does not exist for me.  I exist for him.”  God’s money has a higher purpose than my affluence.  Giving is a joyful surrender to a greater Person and a greater agenda.  Giving affirms Christ’s lordship.  It dethrones me and exalts him.  It breaks the chains of Mammon that would enslave me and transfers my center of gravity to heaven.  . . .  As long as I still have something, I believe I own it.  But when I give it away, I relinquish the control, power, and prestige that come with wealth.  At the moment of release, the light turns on.  The magic spell is broken.  My mind clears, and I recognize God as owner, myself as servant, and other people as intended beneficiaries of what God has entrusted to me (Randy Alcorn, Money, Possessions, and Eternity, pp.197-8).

When Christians give 10% of their income to the Church, it “symbolizes the giving of one’s whole life to God.  . . .  It reminds us that all we are and all we have is from God” (id. at 179).  We ought to be wary of any contrivances, technological or otherwise, that may obscure the spiritual significance of our giving, and in the process, further remove us from the object of our worship.

[Pastor] Baker compares his technology to the days of the Old Testament when people stopped offering sacrifices and started offering coins. “It’s the same now with bringing plastic,” he says. “It’s an evolution -- and this will take root.”

I hope Pastor Baker is right, and kiosks carry no liabilities.  But what if he’s wrong?  What if giving kiosks are not entirely benign?  At what cost might Stevens Creek be getting this added convenience and consistency for its congregants and enhanced predictability of income for its administrators?  Is there no danger that such technology might help remove giving from the realm of worship? 

One of the arguments offered by proponents of giving kiosks (and other forms of payment, such as automatic online payments or payroll deductions) is that people today less commonly carry cash or a checkbook.  Instead they carry debit and credit cards.  Churches that offer alternatives to cash and check thus say that they are “meeting people where they are.”  I wonder if it is as simple as that. 

“Giving is at its best when it’s a conscious [and deliberate] effort that’s repeatedly made” (Alcorn at 201).  To the extent we give without deliberate thought, we risk depleting our giving efforts of a worshipful nature.  By relieving congregants of the need to think and prepare for worship by writing a check or bringing cash, might these churches be changing the nature of giving – for the worse?  To think christianly about such technology requires that we admit this possibility, doesn’t it?

January 19, 2007

Worldview Theater: The Shawshank Redemption

Servants Quarters 2007 is in full swing.  We convened last night for the third time to continue our year-long dialogue exploring the implications of biblical stewardship principles for living in a culture captive to materialistic ideals.  During this latest gathering, we planned to discuss the worldview perspectives reflected in a specific product of American culture:  the critically-acclaimed and highly popular film, The Shawshank Redemption.  God had other plans. 

I hope and trust we were following His lead, as we shelved our Shawshank examination in favor of a spirited discussion concerning the crisis facing The Episcopal Church (TEC).  In particular, we explored what it means for The Falls Church (and other parishes who only recently disaffiliated from TEC) to be wise and faithful stewards of the property with which they have been blessed – as the Diocese of Virginia and TEC press headlong into litigation aimed at reclaiming that property.

Given the dynamic and volatile nature of the situation, I abstain, at this time, from sharing my specific thoughts on the matter.  What I will say is that we are striving to approach the situation with not just a Christian ethic and Christian spirituality (which no doubt are important) but also a Christian mind.  We are striving to help each other “think christianly” – “to accept all things with the mind as related, directly or indirectly, to man’s eternal destiny as the redeemed and chosen child of God” (Harry Blamires, The Christian Mind:  How Should a Christian Think? p.44).  We are striving to “set[ ] all earthly issues within the context of the eternal, . . . see[ing] all things here below in terms of God’s supremacy and earth’s transitoriness, in terms of Heaven and Hell” (id. at 4).  In one sense, that’s the primary business of Servants Quarters.

Because of that fruitful detour, we’ve decided to hold our Shawshank discussion here in this forum.  All are welcome to pose questions, share observations or take issue with what I’ve written previously.  (In short, I observed that (1) Andy Dufresne (Tim Robbins) reflected in important ways the biblical notion of how important it is to maintain an eternal perspective, while living here and now;  and (2) the redemption of Andy’s best friend, Red Redding (Morgan Freeman), was suggestive of a Christian-like process of repentance.) 

If you prefer specific to open-ended questions, let’s begin the discussion with the subject of beauty.  What is attractive in the film?  What people, places, behavior or ideas?  To whom?  How is it made attractive?

January 18, 2007

About Us

TRUTH AND GRACE VENTURES is a 501(c)(3) charitable organization aimed at equipping people to live joyfully as faithful stewards and servants of God.  Learn more about our mission and programs.